29 July, 2012

Movie of the Week


The Fall (2006)
Directed by Tarsem Singh
Starring Lee Pace, Catinca Untaru
Truly one of the most beautiful films I've ever seen. On the outskirts of Los Angeles, 1920, an injured stunt tells a fellow patient, a young girl, an epic story about five heroes. The line between reality and fiction begins to blur due to his fractured state of mind and her vivid imagination to create a film that is wonderfully pieced together. Performances by Pace and Untaru are amazing. This is one of the most visually stunning films I've ever had the pleasure of viewing thanks to the artistic genius of Singh. This is balanced nicely by the heart felt story line about a broken man and a bubbly young girl. 
A must see. 


19 July, 2012

The Dark Knight Rises (dir. Lord Christopher Nolan)

When you've been waiting for a film for four years in anticipation, there's never really anything negative you'll be able to say about it upon viewing it. Such is the case with this film. Chris Nolan has stepped it up again. I don't know how he does it honestly. This may be the most biased review you've ever read because Chris Nolan is my favourite modern filmmaker next to Tarantino, so be prepared for fangirling.
Firstly, I would like to talk about how amazing Bane is. Tom Hardy owned the role, honestly almost stole the film. As a fan of the comics, I appreciate the restoration of this character. He is terrifying, brute force obviously being on of strengths. However, I am so glad they included the fact that Bane is horrifically smart, ultimately being Bruce's match in force (perhaps he supersedes him in some aspects) and wits.
Christian Bale is always amazing as Bruce. He always draws out the emotional reaction he needs to get from the audience, as does Michael Caine as Alfred, who is really the heart of this film. Gary Oldman is... Well, it's GARY OLDMAN. Marion Cotillard is always just lovely on screen, so no surprises (...) there. I really want to discuss two of the other newcomers to the franchise. Joseph Gordon Levitt and Anne Hathaway were phenomenal. Anne Hathaway, much like Hardy, steals the show every time she's on screen and is so sultry and yet so sinister. JGL really steps it up in this film as GPD Office John Blake. He is so honest on screen and really plays that pivotal "white knight" role, much like Harvey Dent. He still believes in the Bat and it's so nice to see such a truthful character amongst all the theatricality of the masks that the hero and villain nominate to wear... Well, not so much Bane...
As a massive fan of Batman, I had the one concern that I'm sure every other fan did as well: did Chris Nolan ruin the chances of this film being good by making setting the bench mark so high with it's predecessor the Dark Knight (undisputedly one of the best films of the last two decades)? No, he doesn't. Screenwriter Jonathan Nolan has wonderfully adapted another piece of cinema. The plot is amazing, I won't go into it because it needs to be seen to be believed. The plot twists are great, the characters are great, the stunts are great, the fight scenes are great. Nolan and brother really just deliver a spectacle. It RISES (heh) to the challenge set my the Dark Knight Rises and in a lot of ways knocks it out of the park. Where the Dark Knight is a stand alone film and will always be iconic, as a trilogy this film is the best in some aspects.
The film comes full circle, making reference to Batman Begins rather than TDK, which I love. It rounds out the series terrifically and it is the perfect ending to the trilogy.
Watch out for that last shot though, it gave me heart palpitations (in a good way).
The Dark Knight Rises is pure emotion, I was in hysterics in the last 15 minutes of the film. It's amazing. AMAZING. There's not many ways I can coherently put it into words without rambling on about specific vital plot points, nor can I discuss it without crying.
This is the movie I was waiting for.
Five stars.

-Cassie (now going by Batman)

08 July, 2012

The Amazing Spiderman (dir. Marc Webb)

The untold story? Oh really...
Here it is, the inevitable reboot of a story we've heard so many times before. Boy becomes orphan, boy grows up with aunt and uncle, boy gets bitten by radioactive spider, boy's uncle says some stuff about responsibility before getting shot, boy gets pissed, boy becomes vigilante dressed in a red and blue unitard... as you do. I myself am a self professed comic book geek. But where I care for Deadpool, the world apparently just needed another Spiderman film (WHERE'S MY DEADPOOL MOVIE, MARVEL?). So you have to give it to them, making me care about a character I previously didn't really care for is a massive feat. Snaps for you. 
I think what really saved this movie and made it far more interesting then it's predecessors is the casting of Andrew Garfield. Wow. He is Spiderman. He is awkward, he is lanky, he says sorry a lot, he's a smart ass, we get to see his love for science (Oh em gee he built his own web shooters; NERDGASM); he is the quintessential Peter Parker that all comic book fans know and love and thank god for Andrew Garfield. He is so charismatic and really just embodies the character. Like Robert Downey Jr owns and Heath Ledger owns the Joker, Andrew Garfield owns Spiderman. 
Props can also be given to Rhys Ifans. I have been reading reviews, and I personally believe people aren't giving this wonderful actor (well, in my opinion) enough credit. He makes you empathise with the character. You want him to succeed in his experiments. Jesus, give the man some acting props, he played a giant lizard for crying out loud!
Performances from Denis Leary and Emma Stone are also strong. Unfortunately, Gwen Stacy is very much the girlfriend character but at she actually does something... you know, like create the antidote that saves the whole city... SPOILERS! Stone is so charming, you can't help but be drawn to the character. 
I could be biased here because 500 Days of Summer is one of my favourite movies, but Marc Webb has done a great job directing this. The point of view scenes when Spidey is swinging around New York are awesome and the fight scenes are great. 
Unfortunately, yes we have heard this story. It was only 2007 when the last Spiderman film came out, so was it too soon to reboot the whole series? The material feels reused and old, despite making the best of it. It is a much better origin story then the Sam Raimi Spiderman so it's such a shame that those films still linger in the back of our minds and almost taint this one. 
Maybe we should just burn all the DVDs and taps because THIS is Spiderman. 
So if you'll excuse me, I have a comic book series to read seeing as now I am emotionally invested in Peter Parker. 

FOUR OUT OF FIVE NOLAN CLAPS (it's my new rating system, leave me alone, I'm excited)

UPDATE: I have to add then when I left the cinema that first thing that came to my head was "but the Dark Knight Rises...". We'll see how you fair in the box office then Spidey...

-Cassie

01 July, 2012

Movie of the week/year/decade/century

                                Shame (2011)
Directed by Steve McQueen
Starring Michael Fassbender, Carey Mulligan

Truly one of the most emotional cinematic experiences of my life, Shame is upsetting, confronting and unexpected. Following the life of Brandon Sullivan, a sex addict, and the emotional turmoil that goes along with it as well as the consequences it has on his daily life, including the relationship with his sister, Sissy. Performances are outstanding, with Michael Fassbender finally getting the recognition he deserves. Mulligan is also stunning, particularly in the scene where she sings New York. The emotion is palpable. The unsung hero of this film, however, is Steve McQueen's direction which is perfectly sublime. Truly a masterpiece of film and a moving piece of cinema. 
Five out of five. 

04 May, 2012

Appearances can be deceptive but necessary: An analysis of 1984 and Planet of the Apes


Appearances may be deceptive but necessary when confronted with the threat of those who threaten society. The novel 1984 by George Orwell demonstrates a society in which deceptive appearances are essential for the ruling government, as well as appearances being critical for the average being to survive. Planet of the Apes demonstrates the cruelty of deception and the heights it is taken to until it becomes a power- seeking quest. 1984 (1949) and PotA (1968) present appropriations of their contexts, in which totalitarian governments were feared. The manipulation of this fear was used to their advantage, as demonstrated in the texts.
1984 presents the power of appearance in deluding the ordinary citizen of Oceania. Orwell constructs a city of illusion in order to comment on the effect of appearance and deception in aiding totalitarian regimes in the post-war context. This is presented through the use of the party’s phantasmagoria. The party’s paradoxical slogan “war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength” is used to regulate the people of Oceania via double speak. The use of these contradictory views aims to brainwash the average being into self-regulation, thus aiding the Party’s deception. Further more, the nomenclature of the Ministry of Love, Ministry of Truth, Ministry of Peace and Ministry of plenty are used to aid the façade of the totalitarian regime. The terms are highly paradoxical which, again, is in an attempt to brain wash the average human into self- regulation and mindless following of the party which establishes the party’ use of false appearances in order to advance their illusion of false emotions.
Winston and Julia’s façade as members of the Party is used to allegorize that need deception in appearance is also critical for the average citizen to survive. Their appearance in public is adhering the Party’s ideals. This is exemplified through their participation in Hate Week and their roles in the Ministry of Truth in general. However, their masks are often contrasted with their true appearances. This is exemplified through the symbolism of the note from Julia, which states “I love you”. The declaratory statement subverts the hegemonic governments ideals and is a form of thought crime, which shows that they still have independent thought. This act of rebellion is both Winston and Julia’s true nature, thus demonstrating that they need to able to deceive the party in order to survive and achieve their ultimate goals.
The room above Mr Charington’s shop is also used as a tool to show Winston and Julia’s true identity. The secluded room appears to symbolize freedom, and Winston and Julia are able to shed their appearance of party adherents and are able to express themselves freely. However, it is highly ironic that Winston and Julia are not actually free and are in fact being deceived themselves in what they think is their own deception. The room is monitored by telescreens, the Party revealing themselves in order to maintain control. This demonstrates the Party’s own manipulation of Julia and Winston in allowing them to believe that they are free to shed their phantasmagoria only to be struck down by the power of the rigid regime.
The juxtaposition of the nomenclature of the Ministry of Love and its true nature emphasizes the importance of appearance in deluding society. The name of the ministry is highly ironic as it contradicts the nature of the ministry, which appropriates the conditions of a labor camp. This magnifies that the party often manipulates appearances in society in order to maintain control. The ministry also manipulates the fear of those in society in order to break their masks. This is demonstrated through the symbolism of the rat mask in room 101 which Winston deeply fears. The appearance of the rat mask leads to manipulation of this fear, which brings Winston to breaking point portrayed upon Winston exclaiming “Do it to Julia! Not me! Julia!” This exemplifies the relentlessness of the regime in their misleading of society by bringing their minds to breaking points, which leads to self-regulation.
The conclusion of the novel aids in exhibiting the manipulation of appearance in order to regulate the people of Oceania. The irony of the statement “he had on the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother” illustrates the way in which the party has influenced the malleability of Winston’s mind in order to make the themselves appear as something they weren’t previously thought of, specifically big Brother. The love shown to Big Brother in this chapter is contrasted to Winston’s previous thought “DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER” highlighting the malleability of his mind due to the party’s manipulation of fear in order to regulation society and remain hegemonic.
Planet of the Apes (1968) appropriates the tensions felt in the post-war era, more specifically the cold war. In the text, it is highlight that although appearances can be deceptive, the powers of totalitarian regimes become brutal to the point that it is a power-seeking quest. The theriomorphism of the totalitarian regime isn’t deceptive at all but rather portrays the appearance of the government for what they really are. The use of the apes symbolizes the primitive nature of absolutist government. It’s also used to portray the way in which the dictatorial regime devolves human kind, contrasting the tribal and unsophisticated humans of the planet to present-day man, represented by George Taylor. In this way, it is shown the manipulation does not have to be used to oppress power but rather brute force.
The use of force and degradation rather that deception in appearance is again shown as useful through the characterization of George Taylor. George Taylor is symbolic of the traditional American hero who the nation looks to in times of trouble. His bravery is initially represented through the statement “keep your stinkin’ paws off me you damn, dirty ape!” However, the apes radically alter his appearance by treating him like an animal, illustrating that the system is willing to use brute force rather than deception to radically alter people’s states of minds to create an oppressive regime.
Although the appearance of the apes makes it blatantly clear that the totalistic administration is animalistic, deception is still used to a degree in order to oppress humans. This is used from the declaratory statement “you took away his memory!” identifies that the apes, as a symbol for oppression, have distorted the natural feature of the human mind to make it more malleable, assisting their regime in allowing it to maintain control. The malleability that is forced upon human’s minds is also demonstrated through the motif of the cages. This animalistic imagery shows the people as animals, ironically, rather than the apes, demonstrated the establishment’s need to tame them in order to maintain the hegemonic government.
The initial appearance of the planet is also used to show how the regime has shown deception. The knowledge comes to the audience at the end of the film when the “unnamed” planet is revealed to be Earth. This is communicated through the symbolism of the statue of liberty, which is a recognizable image of human development. It is implied that men in fact brought on their own destruction due to the powers of an oppressive regime during the cold-war turning the Forbidden Zone which was once a “paradise” into a “wasteland, ironically. This is also revealed in the declaratory statement “they blew us up!” The use of the third person “they” has an accusing tone, demonstrating that the manipulation of fear that the totalitarian governments participated in is what led to the nuclear catastrophe. At this point it is also revealed that the Apes have been deceiving the humans as well as their own society for a considerable amount of time to avoid another catastrophe such as the nuclear war but also to suppress anti-government feelings which may lead to the fall of their society, according to the destruction of the previous one before them.
Appropriations of the post-war context demonstrated that appearance could be deceptive but necessary in order for totalitarianism to be the hegemonic ideal in society.  This is shown through the text 1984 by George Orwell who communicates that the government must use the deception in order to maintain control as well the people of society who must use deception in appearance to survive. Franklin j. Schaffer’s Planet of the Apes (which appropriates the context of the Cold War) thoroughly explores not only the brute force necessary for a totalitarian regime to reign but also the way in which they much deceive their societies. Both the texts demonstrated the controlling nature of the establishment through deception in appearance. 


- Cassie
PS this is my extension 1 english essay. I uploading it for backup reasons as well as sharing with everyone I guess. 

19 April, 2012

Movie of the Week


                    American Psycho (2000)
Directed by Mary Harron
Starring Christian Bale, Jared Leto, Chloe Sevigny

Based on the novel by Bret Easton Ellis, this movie promises a fantastic satirical view on the yuppies of the 80's. Not for the light-hearted (it's been given an R18+ rating due to violence), the movie follows Patrick Bateman, a narcissistic business man and serial killer. He hides this side and is seemingly your self obsessed yuppie of the 80's for me, it's the way he tries to fit in that solidifies this film as amazing. Despite being a raving lunatic, Bateman is obsessed with having the best material possessions in order for people to like him (upon seeing Paul's business card that is hardly different from his he says "Look at that subtle off-white coloring. The tasteful thickness of it. Oh my God, it even has a watermark!"). 
It's the litte things that make this movie a gem. That way Bateman notices every single detail in his appearance as well as others, the way he blatantly stated that he likes to dissect girls and that he is utterly insane to one of co-workers who just waves him off (which happens in different forms through out the film) which just helps the message of the yuppie being a self absorbed, ignorant man. I LOVE EVERYTHING ABOUT THIS FILM! It is just amazing on all accounts and of course just reminds me why Christian Bale is one of my favourite actors. 
5/5
-Cassie

The Lucky One (dir. Scott Hicks)

Nicholas Sparks has done it again! Another film adaptation of one of his novels, soon to hit a big screen near you. Perhaps it's because Ryan Gosling and Rachel McAdams worked together so well in the Notebook and that just gives me high expectations, but I tend to find that most of Sparks' movie adaptations there after are bland and seem to lack a plot such as The Lucky One, unfortunately.
I feel a little bit ashamed of Scott Hicks I must say. From coming from such a wonderful film such as Shine, it's a disappointment that he's directed such a lackbuster film. There are moments where the cinematography is outstanding, particularly in the sequence where the brooding protagonist, Logan, decides to walk from Colorado to Louisiana (because that's believable...). From these shots we can see why Shine was such an outstanding film, but unfortuneatly they don't do much for this film especially since the target audience is probably a bunch of teenage girls (hello, casting of Zac Efron).
That brings me to my next point; acting. Perhaps it's because I, myself, am a teenage girl but I don't find 'Zefron' to be a bad actor. I do believe he had been type cast and that he is marketed to teenage girls. I think he is an actor who just needs to the right role to shine. He has potential and he does try to illustrate this through this film but unfortunately the character is quite badly written, made to make teenage girls swoon at the site of him. As for Taylor Schilling as the female lead... Just underwhelming. A so-so performance from a so-so actress. Her performance was so underwhelming to me, I don't remember that character's name despite only seeing it yesterday.
All in all, the plot was pretty bad as well. I am baffled as to why Logan didn't reveal the picture of (insert her name here, I don't remember) to her straight away. Her reaction was so over the top as well, and it was just such an anti-climatic film and so predictable.
All in all, lack of plot, bad script, "meh" acting... Maybe I should give it an extra star just for all the gratuitous shots of Zac Efron's muscles...

2/5

-Cassie

Watch if you liked: the Notebook; The Vow; Dear John; A Walk To Remember; The Last Song